Tis the season for the lives of geniuses captured on film. The similarities
between Alan Turing biopic
The Imitation Game and the Stephen Hawking movie
The
Theory of Everything stretch beyond the gigantic intellect of their
subjects. Both films endeavor to simplify extraordinary achievements to fit
within understandable genre. For Hawking it was a love story; for Turing its
wartime espionage that captures the attention of his feverish brain. While
effective at cementing Turing's place as a WWII hero who was tragically
punished for his sexuality, so much of
The Imitation Game is boiled down for
easy consumption that it doesn't compute quite as it should.

Chronicling a WWII story emphasizing brains over firepower, the film stars
Benedict Cumberbatch as the socially awkward and abrasive Turing. A
mathematical heavyweight better with numbers and codes than people, Turing is
recruited to head up a top secret program to decipher the Nazi
"Enigma" code which had been confounding the Allies and extending an
already terrible war. The longer it takes to crack Enigma, the more soldiers
die. Crack the code, the war ends; everybody goes home heroes, right? Well, not
so easy. Penned by first-timer Graham Moore, the story does a great job getting
across just how important Turing's mission is, but also the price he would pay
for accomplishing it.
Joined by other highly-skilled cryptanalysts and big brains such as eventual
fiancé Joan Clarke (Keira Knightley) and Hugh Alexander (Matthew Goode), Turing
is essentially in a race against multiple ticking clocks, and the suspense of
it is consistently thrilling in a spy movie kind of way. A machine is built
that should be able to figure out Enigma; the higher-ups don't believe in it;
Turing's team don't believe in him because he's such a jerk. Of course he'll
need to soften his tone and make a few friends before everything can work out.

The film is titled
The Imitation Game and it applies as much to
Turing's personal life as the codes he's so adept at cracking. Jumping between
Turing's childhood, 1941 during the war, and 1951 long after it was over, we're
gently taken through Turing's personal life, as if director Morten Tyldum hopes
to tip-toe us through the scandalous weeds. A homosexual during a time when it
was a crime to be so, Turing's eccentric personality and introverted nature are
forged out of intense secrecy. Later, he would be convicted for being gay and
forced to undergo dehumanizing hormonal treatments. While its heartbreaking to
watch the brilliant Turing reduced to a scared, quivering wreck interrogated by
a weary cop, these scenes are treated with a tremendous amount of British
subtlety. It's a lot like they're still embarrassed over the treatment Turing
received. But when exploring the dark morality at the center of this great
Enigma mystery the film briefly reaches incredibly tense heights. Cracking the code may
save lives, but revealing their success could doom thousands more. How do you
keep something like that secret? Should you? It becomes a game of choosing
which attacks to foil and which to let happen, a terrible choice nobody should
be forced to make. They've been granted the power of life and death for a great
many people, and the exploration of that is one of the film's most gripping
aspects. Certainly it's more interesting than watching them stare at the
machine while we wonder what's going on.
Cumberbatch is good, as expected, but that seems to be the recurring theme
with him. He's good. Playing Turing as close to on the Autism scale as
possible, his performance is appropriately awkward and bristling, but
Cumberbatch is beginning to play every character in the same fashion. The rest
of the cast aren't given much to work with despite playing renowned figures in
the field, as well. Basically they exist to reflect certain aspects of Turing's
personality. Goode is all swagger as the brilliant Alexander, while Knightley
is the lens through which we see Turing's dual lives. Their
friendship-turned-"romance" is never given the attention needed to be
resonant later on, but Knightley is reliably effective.

In the end,
The Imitation Game ably details a little-known corner of
the WWII story, one that has incredible relevance today. Turing, who was only
recently given an official apology by the British government, is considered one
of the forefathers of the modern computer and a leader in the field of
artificial intelligence. Despite the terrible prejudice and persecution he
would face, Turing's legacy is undeniable and can never be lost to the annals
of history. The Imitation Game doesn't connect us with Turing in the way it
should, but by showing us the tremendous good he was able to accomplish it
makes us thankful he was who he was.