Adapting David Mitchell's complex,
interweaving puzzle box of a novel in Cloud Atlas
posed a unique sort of
challenge. The book seamlessly merges six storylines, spread through
time and space with fragments of each blending into the next and back again.
Yet they are all bonded, not just through characters that appear in various
forms along the way, but also in some of the larger themes that resonate
throughout.
As easy as it's become to rip the
Wachowski siblings over the aimlessness of their Matrix films, or their penchant for new age
mumbo-jumbo, there is perhaps no pair better suited to undertaking an epic such
as this. Here working alongside German director Tom Tykwer(Run Lola Run), they've taken the complicated
work Mitchell's done and did the unexpected by making it even more fractious.
It's a bold decision, but the type you'd expect from such a group of forward
thinkers, who for better or for worse have all attempted films that break the
mold. What they've done is take Cloud Atlas and filter it through their
own unique vision, aligning the threads in different and unexpected ways,
bringing their gift for passionate, sweeping scope and weaving a richer
experience that defies simple description.
There's no straight narrative to
speak of, as each story breaks and jumps around in time at a moment's notice
and without warning. Yet each feels like a close-relative to the other, the
ideas, themes, and occasionally dialogue crossing over so that to try and
single out an individual thread is to reduce the whole. At its simplest, Cloud
Atlas is about how one action in the past can cause a butterfly effect in
the future. Those who wish to look at the film through this lens won't be
disappointed, but there are larger ideas at play that only enhance it. The
everlasting nature of love; the propensity to hate; greed; jealousy; and faith
are all explored in masterful storytelling strokes. Perhaps the theme that best
stood out for me in particular was the human desire for freedom. Freedom from
our pasts; freedom from oppression; freedom from confinement; and freedom from
our inherent natures. Cloud Atlas is a film that can and should be many
things to many different kinds of people.
The all-star cast encompasses a
number of different roles in different genders and races, although many of
these characters carry many of the same character traits. For instance, Hugo
Weaving plays a subconscious devil haunting a future version of Tom Hanks and
encouraging him to be a coward. Narratively, the story begins in much the same
way as Mitchell's novel, on a 19th century South Pacific ship where a naive lawyer
(Jim Sturgess) sees his world expanded in good and bad ways by a stowaway and a
treacherous doctor (Hanks).
In 1936 Cambridge, a penniless musician
(Ben Whishaw) becomes the amanuensis to an aging, opportunistic composer (Jim
Broadbent). An intrepid reporter (Halle Berry) in 1970s San Francisco attempts
to live up to her father's legacy by breaking a whistleblower's story on a
nuclear power plant that failed safety inspections. In current times, a book publisher
(Broadbent) with money troubles finds himself comically locked up in a nursing
home.
The greatest impacts are felt in the
future, both the near and distant. In Neo-Seoul, a cloned Asian waitress(Bae
Doona) rebels against tyranny with the help of her human lover(Sturgess). In
the far-flung future, after the world has been destroyed in an event known as
"The Fall", Zachry (Hanks) of a primitive island tribe fights against
his own savage instincts when visited by Meronym (Berry), the last of a
technological race.
Everyone involved show a remarkable
adaptability and versatility, but it's Hanks who is the lynchpin of practically
every segment through his comedic and dramatic range. He brings certain
quirkiness as the love-struck scientist working alongside Berry's reporter,
while also showing how nasty he can be as a violent novelist who comes up with
a unique way of pumping up book sales. Only Hugh Grant seems to really
struggle, and it's not really because he's bad, but mostly due to his
characters not really having the importance of the others.
Technically, the film is absolutely
stunning. From the very first frame, Cloud Atlas looks and feels bigger
than anything else out there. Not just visually, but in terms of stature. The Wachowskis
and Tykwer are aiming to do something more. They're attempting to hit a bar
that others will spend years just trying to equal. Not everything quite works
out in the way they were hoping, however. As stunning and wonderfully detailed
as each era looks, the opposite is the case for many of the transformations the
actors undergo. Most distracting are the totally unconvincing make-up to turn
the very British Jim Sturgess into an Asian, and the same goes for veteran
actor Keith David who underwent the same ridiculous procedure.
Clocking in at a shade under three
hours in length, some of the storylines are stretched way too thin. So many different
segments mean some get more attention than others, leading to transitions that
aren't quite as smooth and connections that aren't as clearly defined.
There are plenty of films with great
ambitions that far exceed their grasp. Last year's The Tree of Life is one example, while many
would also note Ridley Scott's Prometheus. Both are good films in their own
way, but Cloud Atlas, despite being of the sci-fi genre, is more closely
aligned with the former. Much like Terrence Malick's film, Cloud Atlas
aims to inspire and ask deep questions without any talk of franchises and
sequels. If not everything in it is successful, Cloud Atlas is a
riveting, thought-provoking, and inventive work of art. The conclusion hits a
raw nerve of honesty, sadness, and hopefulness that the Wachowskis and Tykwer
so carefully opened us up to. While not perfect, we need more movies like Cloud
Atlas that aspire to be something greater.